Debates for Beginner On VersyTalks' Debate Platform

Debates for Beginner On VersyTalks' Debate Platform

10 Views7 Mins Read
TL;DR

VersyTalks is great for debate for beginners in 2026 because every new debate has a level tag (Beginner–Elite) with a coach tooltip explaining what to expect. Filter by Beginner, read a few arguments, then write yours using structured fields (claim, reasons, evidence, counter, conclusion). Stay respectful, earn votes, and level up over time.

Why VersyTalks Added “Debate Levels” in 2026

VersyTalks began 2026 with an update that makes it much easier for newcomers to join the conversation. Every debate published this year (and for forever) features a level tag — Beginner, Medium, Hard or Elite — that appears at the top of the debate.

When users hover over the tag, a tooltip pops up with guidance from professional debaters and coaches. The tooltip briefly explains what to expect at that level (for example, how much prior knowledge is assumed or how complex the arguments may be) and offers tips on structuring a strong contribution.

This feature builds on VersyTalks’ existing focus on structured, respectful discourse. On VersyTalks everyone is welcome: “Whether you are a beginner or a seasoned debater, our platform provides the perfect space to sharpen your reasoning and connect with like‑minded individuals”.

How the Level Tags Work

Clearly marked difficulty

Each debate published now displays a colored label (Beginner, Medium, Hard or Elite). Beginner debates tackle broad questions with accessible background information. Medium debates require more prior knowledge, while Hard and Elite debates delve into technical or niche issues.

Contextual tooltip

When hovering over a level tag, a short tooltip appears. It explains why the debate is classified at that level and offers quick advice (e.g., “focus on personal examples” for beginner debates). These tips come from professional debaters and coaches, making them concise and reliable.

Filter and exploration

Users can filter debates by level. This helps newcomers find topics that match their comfort level and gradually work up to more challenging discussions.

Integration with other features

The level system complements features such as the monthly Debater of the Month (DotM) competition and the structured argument mode. New debaters can start with Beginner debates, submit arguments through the structured mode and gradually earn votes toward the DotM leaderboard.

Tips for Beginners on VersyTalks

Start with Beginner‑tagged debates.

These debates provide plenty of background and are designed to be approachable. The tooltip helps you understand the central question and suggests ways to build your argument.

Use the structured argument mode.

VersyTalks offers a guided writing feature that breaks arguments into five fields (claim, reasons, evidence, counterargument and conclusion) to help you “create clear, logical and persuasive arguments”.

Read others’ arguments.

Each debate page lists previous contributions. Reading through them can show you how experienced debaters structure their reasoning and can inspire your own response.

Stay respectful. The guidelines on every debate page remind participants to add meaningful value, avoid phatic comments, and keep discussions civil. This culture makes it easier for beginners to contribute without fear of being ridiculed.



Beginner‑Friendly Debates from 2026

The following debates are well‑suited for beginners.

1. Private weapons should be banned by law

This debate proposes banning private weapons and offers background on recent tragedies. The moral question is straightforward and allows debaters to draw on personal values and public‑safety arguments.

2. Is the future defined more by technology or values?

This free‑form debate asks whether technological advances or cultural values drive society’s trajectory. The description outlines both sides, encouraging participants to consider examples like AI regulation, climate technology and democratic norms.

3. Should companies require prior experience for entry‑level jobs and internships?

This proposal invites discussion about fairness and opportunity in the job market. Beginners can rely on personal experiences or news stories to argue whether such requirements are reasonable.

4 Should your value as a person depend on your results?

This nuanced debate challenges the assumption that achievements define worth. It encourages reflection on privilege, mental health and the difference between inherent dignity and productivity.

5. Is cancel culture a form of censorship?

The debate asks whether public backlash amounts to silencing speech. Participants can draw on recent events and consider the balance between accountability and free expression.

6. People should date within their social circle, not online

This motion discusses whether online dating has eroded more natural ways of meeting partners. It’s a relatable question that allows new debaters to share personal experiences and observations. Would you be able to debate the Devil's Advocate for this debate?

7. Do New Year’s resolutions drive real behavior change, or are they designed to fail?

Published near the start of the year, this debate weighs whether setting resolutions leads to lasting change or false optimism. It invites personal anecdotes and psychological insights rather than technical expertise.

8. Is pornography good or bad for society?

The debate raises concerns about exposure to pornography and its social impact. It invites ethical and practical arguments and encourages participants to consider youth protection and personal freedom.

9. Is the rise of influencers good for society?

The debate outlines how influencers democratize fame but also promote unrealistic standards. It’s an accessible topic for teens and adults who spend time online and have observed influencer culture.

10. Should social media likes and follows be hidden to protect mental health?

This debate summarises research linking visible likes to anxiety and depression and asks whether hiding metrics could reduce pressure. The discussion is grounded in everyday social‑media use and invites personal perspectives.

11. Should social media platforms be responsible for fact‑checking user content?

The debate frames the issue around misinformation and the balance between free speech and the need for accurate information. It’s topical and invites novice debaters to consider how tech companies should combat “fake news.”

12. Is online dating ruining the dating scene and relationships?

This debate notes how online dating apps have transformed romance and questions whether the changes harm relationship quality. The subject is familiar to many and encourages participants to weigh convenience against authenticity.

There are a lot more debates for beginners!

For beginners, starting with Beginner‑tagged debates like those listed above can help build confidence and hone argumentative skills in a supportive environment. As you grow comfortable, explore Medium, Hard and Elite debates to deepen your knowledge and challenge your reasoning.

In all cases, remember that VersyTalks prioritizes respectful, structured discourse: use the structured argument mode, follow the debate guidelines and enjoy sharpening your critical thinking alongside a global community.

Related Posts