Genetics can influence a person's temperament, impulses, risk-taking, aggression, addiction vulnerability, and susceptibility to certain behaviors, but a genetic predisposition does not necessarily determine what someone will do. This creates a difficult question about responsibility: if someone has a biological tendency that makes a particular behavior harder to resist, should they still be held to the same standards as someone without that predisposition? The debate explores the relationship between free will and biology, personal responsibility, environmental influences, self-control, and the extent to which people should be accountable for actions that may be partly shaped by factors outside their control.