The proposition that protests should be banned raises significant questions about the balance between public order and democratic freedoms. Protests—organized public expressions of dissent—have been essential to social and political change throughout history. From the civil rights movement in the United States to anti-colonial uprisings and global climate marches, public demonstrations have shaped legislation, overthrown regimes, and brought attention to marginalized voices. The right to protest is enshrined in many democratic constitutions and international human rights documents, such as the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These frameworks recognize peaceful assembly as a cornerstone of civic engagement and government accountability. However, the logistics and impacts of protests can lead to controversy. Governments may restrict demonstrations that block traffic, disrupt businesses, or risk public safety. In some countries, protests are heavily monitored, regulated, or even criminalized, often under the pretext of national security or social stability. The rise of digital platforms has also transformed how protests are organized, spreading messages quickly but also raising concerns over misinformation or radicalization. Banning protests outright would mark a significant departure from democratic norms. To understand this debate, one must consider the historical role of civil resistance, the legal found